Get Adobe Flash player
Hindraf de facto leader P.Uthayakumar as a matter of principle ready to be jailed up to 3 years or will opt for jail even if only a fine is imposed & will not apply for stay of jail sentence for Sedition letter case to UK PM Gordon Brown on Kg Medan ethnic cleansing, Malay supremacist govt policies & UMNO institutional racism etc victimising Indian poor in Malay-sia : 9.00 a.m on 3rd, 4th & 5th June 2013 K.L. Sessions Court. Pathmarajah & Co. Chartered Accountants - Maybank Acct No. : 514075011112 - "You Must Be The Change You wish To See In The World" ~ Gandhi - Follow us on www.hindraf.org , Twitter - HINDRAF1 or Facebook Hindraf Support Group.

IMG_2252MM

Court of Appeal Judges Dato Sri Abu Samah bin Nordin Alizatul Khair bt Dato Osman and Lim Lee Lan today (17/7/12) dismissed Hindraf Makkal Shakti’s application to be a registered NGO.

Attorney General Tan Sri Gani Patail’s alter ego Senior Federal Counsel Noor Hisham bin Ismail’s demeanour was so obvious that the Court was with him. To the point that when told his written submission that he had filed only yesterday (16/7/12) was not in the Court file and when Dato Sri Abu Samah told him to make a photocopy and come back after lunch Noor Hisham replied that he just had a very few points. When the Judge said that it was already almost 1.30 p.m, Noor Hisham replied that he won’t take long. Judge Dato Sri Abu Samah then replied that he needs the written submission and “cannot simply dismiss” the Appellant (Hindraf’s ) case!

IMG_2247After lunch break the Federal Counsel made his token submissions including a letter of rejection of Hindraf Makkal Shakti by the Registrar of Societies (ROS) dated 22/9/2011 ie “Pemberitahuan mengenai penolakan Pendaftaran,… maka adalah diberitahu bahawa saya telah menolak pendaftaran Hindraf Makkal Shakti. Full stop. And no reason given for this arbitrary decision.

Despite Uthayakumar’s objections that this decision by the ROS was made only about 3 months after the decision of the K.L High Court that rejected Hindrafs’ application it did not matter in the Malay-sian Courts.

And that it is not part of the Court of Appeal Records of Appeal and it is the mere statement from the Bar table by the said Senior Federal Counsel. Or at the very least not even an affidavit was filed enclosing this ROS rejection.

Thus the Court of Appeal’s new new found excuse to dismiss Hindraf application to be registered as a lawful NGO. IMG_2245

Met by reporters outside the Courtroom P. Uthayakumar confirmed that an appeal would be filed to the Federal Courts merely for the record pur poses. As P. Uthayakumar and Hindraf has no records of winning any of their about 50 cases against the UMNO led Malay-sian government. What more with the 95% Malay dominated UMNO 1 Malay-sian Judiciary

Res Ipsa Loquiteour. Justice must not only be done but must manifestedly and undoubtedly be seen to be done is what we studied as law students even in first year at law school.

But in racist Malay-sia, this legal principle has no bearing! Injustice with impunity? By the very Judiciary and the administration of justice that is supposed to dispense Justice!

Karunai Nithi @ Compassionate Justice

Comments are closed.

You might also like


HINDRAF De Facto Leader and Founder (Speech PART 1)
Donate Us


Human Rights Party Malaysia logo HRP Project 15/38
Human Rights Party Malaysia
Announcements
Human Rights Party Malaysia logo
HRP Slideshow
Featured Articles
Our Archives